Dave Portnoy says he might run for mayor of New York City, and every consultant in the five boroughs just felt the ground shift.
The Barstool Sports founder told Fox News Digital this week that a challenge to Democratic Socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani is on the table: "Maybe I'm the guy to do it. Depends on how much more he keeps pissing me off." On Jesse Watters' primetime show, he was even more direct: "I would love to run against him. If I were gonna run, it would be here."
Why it matters: New York City is being run into the ground by a socialist machine that just consolidated power. Three far-left candidates backed by Mamdani won their Democratic primaries last week, virtually guaranteeing them office in deep-blue districts. Portnoy's musing isn't about one man's ambition — it's about whether any outsider with a pulse and a real résumé can break the stranglehold that uniparty politics has on America's largest city.
Portnoy spelled out what's driving him. He pointed to Darializa Avila Chevalier, whose primary win all but secures her the seat, and whose past remarks include saying "all Arab men [and] Black men shouldn't date ugly colonizers" and calling for "no prisons, no quarters, no jails." As Portnoy put it: "She started a group at Columbia that's goal was to overthrow Western society — she just got elected." He also flagged Aber Kawas, who won her State Senate primary, for a 2017 podcast comment linking American foreign policy to the 9/11 attacks: "The system of capitalism and racism and White supremacy… and Islamophobia have all been used to colonize lands, to take resources from other people and so this is a long trajectory, and we're just seeing the manifestations of that continuation with 9/11." Portnoy's reaction was plain: "[Kawas], who just got elected, said America deserved 9/11. Like that to me, is just — I can't even wrap my brain around it."
Fox News laid out those radical statements in full. The New York Post, by contrast, framed the story around Portnoy's "clown politicians" line and his admission that he doesn't know if he can win — a subtle steer toward the electability question rather than the ideological rot Portnoy was describing. Both outlets noted his day-to-day ambivalence, but the Post leaned harder on the uncertainty, as if to say: don't take this too seriously, folks.
That's exactly how the establishment wants you to read it. Dismiss the outsider. Ignore the substance. Focus on the long odds.
Portnoy himself made the case that cuts through: "I've had a real job and done real things. Unlike these clown politicians who have never had a job and who've never been in the real world for a day." Whether he runs or not, that contrast — builder versus parasite — is the fault line running through American politics right now. New York just happens to be where the crack is widest.
Can a guy who built a media empire from nothing win in a city that keeps electing people who want to dismantle the system that made the city possible? Portnoy says he doesn't know the demographics. Fair enough. But he's asking the right question — and the people who've run New York into the ground don't have an answer.








