The corporate press is weaponizing Europe’s record-shattering heatwave to demand more government control over your energy grid, even as the green policies they champion cripple the reliable power working people depend on.

Western Europe just survived its hottest June on record, and the establishment media is using the body count to sell you a bill of goods. The Guardian and The New York Times are running in lockstep: it’s hot, fossil fuels are to blame, and you must submit to a "unilateral decarbonisation" agenda. What they bury is how the climate crusade is already failing the working class.

According to the EU’s Copernicus climate monitoring service, June temperatures across Western Europe averaged 3.05 degrees Celsius above normal. The New York Times reported that Samantha Burgess, a climate scientist with Copernicus, said the records reflect a "climate system continuing to accumulate heat," bringing "growing risks for people, ecosystems and infrastructure." The human toll is real: The Guardian reports early estimates suggest more than 20,000 heat-related deaths across the continent, including 1,747 excess deaths in Belgium and 5,120 in Germany.

Naturally, the press uses this tragedy to push state control. The Guardian quotes France’s high council on climate demanding a "consolidated plan to phase out fossil fuels" and retrofitting homes from "thermal kettles" into decent housing with fixed air-conditioning units. Friederike Otto, a climate science professor at Imperial College London, told The Guardian that the heat is "only possible because of the 1.4C of climate change we have to date, due to the burning of fossil fuels."

But read between the lines. The establishment demands AC for Europeans while their ideological allies in America try to ban your gas stove and restrict your home cooling. Worse, the green grid they demand is already buckling under the strain. The Guardian quietly noted that a French nuclear reactor reportedly shut down in the high heat. Nuclear power—the reliable, zero-carbon baseload the climate lobby tolerates at best and attacks at worst—failed precisely when needed most. Yet the press insists the "cost of inaction is much higher than the cost of the transition." Tell that to the American worker footing the bill for unilateral decarbonization while foreign competitors build coal plants.

The press looks at a European heatwave and sees a mandate to regulate your thermostat. Working Americans should look at the same facts and ask why we’re expected to sacrifice our grid and our paychecks for a green agenda that can’t keep the lights on when the sun beats down.