A Concord woman who treated her husband to one last dinner before letting her boyfriend strangle him was sentenced to life in prison last week — a case that lays bare what happens when the most basic vows between people become disposable.
Francesca Lopez, 48, got 15 years to life for second-degree murder in the 2022 killing of Felipe Lopez-Custodio. Judge John Kennedy rejected a defense bid to knock the conviction down to manslaughter, finding that Lopez had “plied (Lopez-Custodio) with alcohol” to make sure he was helpless when her boyfriend, Ismael Alvarez, clubbed and strangled him with wire and a piece of scrap wood.
“I do find that Ms. Lopez showed no remorse until she was caught,” Kennedy said at Friday's hearing. She also “destroyed evidence” and fabricated a story about a mystery killer to throw police off the trail, according to the judge.
Prosecutors laid out a cold calculation: Lopez planned the couple's final date, made sure they both drank heavily, then brought Alvarez into the home. When Lopez-Custodio passed out on the couch, she watched Alvarez kill him. Afterward, the pair dumped the murder weapon and clothing in a dumpster and withdrew cash from the dead man's bank account at a convenience store ATM.
Alvarez, 38, was sentenced to 50 years to life last year and is now in California State Prison, Los Angeles County.
Lopez's lawyer pushed the familiar abuse-victim narrative at trial, arguing she was a lifelong victim who became fixated on pleasing those around her and was powerless to stop Alvarez, whom the defense claimed acted alone. The jury didn't buy it, and neither did the judge.
The Mercury News covered the sentencing straightforwardly. What neither outlet in our review bothered to ask is the deeper question: what kind of culture produces a woman who can sit through dinner with the man she married, knowing he'll be dead within the hour, and then hit his ATM on the way home? When marriage is reduced by law and culture to a revocable contract with payout provisions, when institutions and entertainment normalize the idea that vows are just words, the Lopez case isn't an anomaly — it's a logical endpoint.
The defense asked the court to see a battered woman. The court saw a calculating killer. Both can be true. What's certain is that Lopez-Custodio is dead, and the system that was supposed to protect the sanctity of his union spent decades making that union easier to dissolve than a gym membership.





