White House advisor Stephen Miller torched the Democrat Party for siding with jihadists in the war on terror, and the establishment press can't even bring itself to name the enemy — a fact every American should weigh next time they're told to trust the institutions running this country.
Twenty-five years after Islamic terrorists murdered nearly 3,000 Americans, the party that runs Washington alongside a compliant media has decided the real problem is calling terrorism by its name. Miller went on Fox News with Sean Hannity and didn't mince words: "The Democrat Party fundamentally has sided with the jihadists in the war on terror. That's where we are right now."
Miller singled out Democrat candidate Abdul El Sayed in Michigan for campaigning alongside Hasan Piker, a streamer whom Miller identified as the new consultant and strategist the Democrat Party leans on for policy direction. According to the Gateway Pundit, Miller told Hannity that Piker "said that American and Americans deserve 9/11." Miller also tied El Sayed to Bernie Sanders, who promoted the same figures.
"The Democrat Party has embraced the platform of individuals who fundamentally hate America and hate Americans," Miller said. "I can't believe we're having this conversation! 25 years after 9/11 and you have Democrats preaching hatred for America."
The numbers tell their own story. The Gateway Pundit reported that an estimated 5.5 million Muslims now live in the United States, with over 1 million in New York City alone — and that 25 years after the attacks, New York City elected Zohran Mamdani, whom the outlet described as an "anti-American Muslim Mayor." The Gateway Pundit placed blame on both Democrats and the "establishment GOP" for facilitating what it called an invasion since 9/11.
Bill Maher, no conservative, is seeing the same rot from the media side. On his HBO show Friday, Breitbart reported, Maher called out four American journalism associations that put out guidance saying the word "terrorism" should only appear in quotes because it's "emotionally and politically loaded." Maher's response: "Yeah, so is the World Cup, but we don't put soccer in quotes."
Maher drew the line plainly: "Really, we can't, anymore, just say out loud who the bad guys were that morning, those 19 hijackers? They shared something. Oh, let's call it a worldview. And it wasn't astrology. But, somehow, over time, we've decided not to harp on that." His jab — that for the press, "when it comes to terrorist attacks, please, there are very fine people on both sides" — landed because it's true.
One party won't name the ideology that killed 3,000 Americans. The press won't either. The question is how long the people who remember will tolerate both.
