80 comments

Welcome to Dissenter

The Comment Section of the Internet
www.youtube.com
watch?v=MUfcrlf-ADA

Researcher fired for doing research on a subject, these are the same people who would of attacked and shamed Darwin for being "wrong" because they don't want to learn something new.


Edit History

2019-34-Fr 10:34:28 pm

Researcher fired for doing research on a subject, these are the same people who would of attacked and shamed Darwin for being wrong because they don't want to learn something new.

loading...

Science-denying butthurt snowflakes, once again.

“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.”

loading...

Science in 2019 - "We're so woke we deny science yet Climate Change causes everything!"

Me - Uh, Honk?!

loading...

Science doesn't care about your feelings, but the feelings of Marxists don't care about your facts. In Gender and Racial studies courses at universities, people are taught that reaching objectivity through rational thought is a western white male way of thinking and that you should challenge that way of thinking.


Edit History

2019-19-Sa 12:19:46 am

Science doesn't care about your feelings, but the feelings of Marxists don't care about your facts. In Gender and Racial studies courses at universities, people are thought that reaching objectivity through rational thought is a western white male way of thinking and that you should challenge that way of thinking.

loading...

The "education system" hasn't been about education for a very long time.

loading...

There are racial differences in intelligence, and those differences are almost certainly in some part genetic. The only debate between honest intelligence researchers is to what degree the observed differences are genetic. Optimistic researchers hope that most of the difference will be equalized as health and nutrition standards improve worldwide. Pessimistic researchers point countries where this is already largely the case and the differences in intelligence, while reduced, are still present and constant.

loading...

Facts are not far right. Science is not extremist.

loading...

Wonder how they would feel if we started calling these universities and demanding they fire all communist professors, or we will come burn down their buildings? A double edged sword cuts both ways.

loading...

When Tim says that you should debunk research rather than ban it, it makes me wonder whether he actually KNOWS that they can't debunk these things and is being disingenuous, or if he actually thinks that academic institutions WOULD ban ideas that they COULD debunk, which is stupid thing to think.

I mean really, I want you to imagine ANY SCENARIO where it would be a rational alternative to systematically censor a given opinion when you COULD simply disprove it. NOTE: These are academic SYSTEMS that choose to censor, so random individual irrationality is not a valid answer to this question.

Even an evil person who was utterly ruthless in promoting their own work would simply choose to disprove the competing research if they could. There are Zero (0) scenarios where it makes sense.

In absence of any conceivable motivation to censor what could be disproven, is it not then logical to say that the academic who CHOOSES to censor disagreement MUST be doing so because the disagreement contains some level of legitimacy?

And through this lens, you can start to understand the state of academic discussion on topics like the science of race and gender, or even history as it relates to communism or the holocaust.

loading...

Tim has to remember that this happened in the UK. The UK has lost it's way

loading...
Log In
Dissenter
connecting...