They have never wanted to release any information regarding this topic because they are engaged in sabotage by means of subterfuge. Hiding the truth is necessary for this to succeed. Destroying white children is the guaranteed method of preventing our continuation.
The white western world is under attack from the inside. If you allow yourself to feel guilty or ashamed for opposing it, they will succeed at destroying you. Whatever argument they throw out is an attempt to make you hold yourself back from doing anything against the attack. The attack will keep coming whether you're a racist, xenophobic, inbred nazi OR NOT, so focus on the importance of countering the attack. That is all that matters.
Let's get rid of every office division above the intern, because the intern feels left out. Let's also get rid of rich people becau-- Wait, is this communism? Retract, retract!
I'm enjoying the analysis of folklore, but I don't think it's a fair assessment to say Robin Hood was libertarian unless you're making the argument that property only belongs to someone if they're able to defend it.
Libertarians would argue that property belongs to whoever first claims that property, and so even though it stretches that argument somewhat - because it would be claiming an unknown quantity of deer - there's no reason why a king couldn't claim every one, especially if they were on land that also broadly belonged to the kingdom.
As far as taking money from clerics, or whoever, their money belonged to them. Just because someone lies about not having money to give away, doesn't mean that money belongs to them any less. He convinced them that their guilt justified the theft.
The Robin Hood you describe is a power-tripping anarchist, more than he is a libertarian.
Most of the world's problems could be solved if everyone just accepted that it's Current Year.
You're not wrong, but taboos will always be appealing. While I generally avoid referring to religion for factual information, they understand this innate desire for humans to be tempted by the things they know are unwise to do.
Realistically, because humans will always inevitably rebel, even if society entirely flipped to one where the nuclear family was done away with, eventually people would reject that norm, and go back to the taboo of monogamy.
I really hope this is all just a stupid act the US is putting on to make undoing their previous deepstate messing look like a naturally-occuring set of events that lead to withdrawal. I'd prefer to hear them say, "we intentionally messed with foreign countries and had them attack US targets for our own political benefit", but I'll reluctantly accept anything that leads to foreign intervention being ceased.
All groups are comprised of people with opposing opinions, because groups are made up of individuals. Even "the powers that be"/"the illuminati"/etc, will inevitably fracture over individual preferences, which is why intelligence agencies usually end up at war one-another.
Realistically it's concerning, but it was equally hilarious to watch that black woman spouting off what could have easily come from 4chan's resident Hitler worshippers. Really quite embarrassing.
"Gender" is still a corruption of "personality", and does not belong in the English language. Whether intentionally, or by pure stupidity, it exists as nothing more than a political weapon.
Sargon of "everyone else eats their own, but not me!" Akkad.
There is so much cognitive dissonance going on with Sargon, that I don't know where to begin.
The BNP, BF, and EDL, were all groups of working-class people, who he knows to not be as well-spoken as middle and upper-classes, who spearheaded the conversations that needed to be had, because they were Brits who could see issues that were affecting them. They were, of course, all branded racists, and discarded.
Now we're in 2019, and the conservatives who almost certainly condemned those other groups, are now on the other end of the stick, having had to do nothing but swallow-up patriots, after causing years of headache for us all.
Those aforementioned groups were not perfect, and they absolutely caused a lot of issues that I don't condone, but I refuse to accept that they weren't mostly just patriotic Brits who wanted exactly what Sargon (and Boris) seems to want. Constantly dragging their names through dirt, and parading them around as boogeymen to suggest that Current Guy Isn't So Bad, is a really fantastic case of backstabbing othering, and eating your own.
Damn it, I got baited into watching a book review.