"Voting strategically may gradually move the dial toward a better Canada, by forcing the parties in power to adopt more progressive policies." Your delusional. "Progressive" policies have never moved the "needle" towards a better Canada. That always leads to a failed economy, massive debts and social dysfunction.
"Voting strategically may gradually move the dial toward a better Canada, by forcing the parties in power to adopt more progressive policies." Your delusional. "Progressive" policies have never moved the "needle" towards a better Canada. That always lead to a failed economy, massive debts and social dysfunction.
We are here to tell you "Greta", that the Man made Climate Change hypothesis has failed every single time it has been compared to reality. https://informativestats.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/hayden_ipcc_arrow.jpg
ALL IPCC cLIEmate UNscience fails this test.
"In all things of a statistical nature, such as measuring climate change over time, a null hypothesis is defined and tested.
The null hypothesis must be assumed to be true unless statistical analysis proves it is outside the range of random probability.
That range has a strict mathematical definition. It is two or more standard deviations away from the prediction of the null hypothesis.
In laymen’s terms it means there is a 95% or greater chance that the null hypothesis is wrong.
In that case, the null hypothesis is rejected."
Not one IPCC Model has passed the statistical test needed to refute the Null Hypothesis.
Your communist claptrap is not selling to the masses.
This is fake NOAA data. "The vast majority of high quality long-term temperature data comes from the US, and in fact much of the planet has little or no long-term temperature data. Because of the poor coverage, it is doubtful that the published global temperature record has any scientific validity. The US is one of very few places with reliable temperature data."
Weather Network is pushing Fake News.
So the Democrats want to start throwing stones in their Glass House?
The Klein cuts were the best thing to happen in Alberta. The more cuts the better!
What idiot left wingers can't comprehend is that their solution to everything, Tax and Spend never works.
Alberta paid off it's debt, it could then spend the money on services like paying Health Care Premiums for all Albertans instead of interest to lenders. Some short term pain for long term gain, made Klein KING!
The fact that this "author" blocks comments shows how weak his arguments really are.
Then Klein cuts were the best thing to happen in Alberta. The more cuts the better!
A good example of why almost no one reads that rag. Albertan's learned the hard way not to split the vote.
"Progressives" have not had an original idea foe at least a century...
So this "Third Party Advertiser" disavows the majority of Canadians? Boycott the losers!
There is NOTHING real about your so called cLIEmate Crisis. It's all based upon failed fiddled data and failed models that were Curve Fitted till they produced what was wanted.
"The climate models are NOT run on basic physics as many cAGW advocates claim, they are run on assumptions and ‘tuned’ parameters. They are run like this for two reasons —
The underlying physics is unknown (hows and whys of atmospheric of water — humidity changes, clouds, precipitation, snow and ice volumes and changes — is almost a complete mystery to the modelers, as too is the physics of the driving force(s) of the ocean cycles, and the how/what/why particulates, dust, and VOC change the climate is also very uncertain.)
Assumptions are made based on the idea that rising atmospheric CO2 will warm the planet. This assumption has never been validated, it is not evident in the real world.
These ‘climate models™’ are PURE HOKUM, they are a method by which the UN-IPCC assumption that CO2 is detrimental to life on the planet is subjected by confirmation bias, and not honest, objective and disinterested scientists working at honest science."
"[email protected] Katastrophe Kooks
August 1, 2019 at 10:20 am | Reply
They’re curve-fitting. That’s why they have so many parameters in their ‘models’… the word put in quotes because what they’re using are not models (which attempt to mathematically mimic the underlying processes causing the observed output), they’re curve-fitting their mathematical algorithms to the output without any regard to the underlying processes which caused that output.
Any futures or stock trader can tell you that curve-fitting on in-series data will invariably fail for out-of-series data, which is why the climate ‘models’ have always invariably failed." https://www.iceagenow.info/climate-models-are-pure-hokum/
The Scientific Method has this to say about the IPCC's models which have ALL failed...
Tyipical Tru-uhh-uhh-DOHH!!!... Scheer would not be welcome there even if he went. It's a lose lose situation for him. He will be subjected to intolerance and hate by the left no matter what he does or says.