No jam gunned? I mean no gun jammed? come on guys! Cara's gun got jammed in episode 4 of this season (the siege one where they attacked the imperial base)
tak co Dissenter? jede? :)
they know tha wae !!
27 000 mexican soldiers guaring the border is a huge win for everyone. Really good job by both presidents. If Obama achieved this left wing media would shit their pants in happiness.
tak kdo je tu přes Dissenter? jen malá zkouška :)
Im very dissapointed... UK has (parliamentary) elections every 5 years... not every 4 years... shame on you Spiff
I wonder if Spore would be rated as a masterpiece if the the last stage was similar gameplay as in the civilization stage, just with different graphics with planets instead of cities...
you are asking to defend secularism against lets say theocratic state... my answer would be that secularism is better because it places less obstacles for the society to progress and evolve forward - obstacles in a form of religious dogma that would strip people of their freedoms, freedoms to think and do - that the best of us (the inventors for example) need to push us all forward with their great inventions... and the theocratic state would sooner or later come to state when strong dogma will be pushed and it will stop any progress being made... it will be pushed because it could be pushed...because in theocratic state power structure it is possible to push for strong dogma... because strong dogma gives the theocratic ruler more power... because power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely... thats why theocratic states would have the tendency to degenerate into totalitarian states that limits peoples lives more than its beneficial to anyone (except for the ruling class) - therefore secular state is better - secular state also has many challenges to stop various types of elitists oligarchs who are trying to usurp all the power and push for hard totalitarian regime, but at least the threat of church elitist oligarchs is dealt with.
Why do I think this is the tendency? Bacause I look at Islam's history. Its very important to remember the golden age of Islam - the age that gave us all the inventions, that pushed humanity forward so much. But every muslim must know why it stopped. Why the greatest most progressive leading culture of the world fell so so much behind when the golden age of Islam stopped. Because the church and the state were not separated. Because anti-science zealots clerics came to power. Bacause these prothets - the political leaders of culture that gave us astronomy and advanced mathematics - banned numbers and pronounced numbers to be devils worship. And time rolled back centuries at that moment in the islamic world - because theocracy state power structure allowed backwards evil men to came to power and oppress their people with strong religious dogma that destroyed everything that the great great men worked on for generations during the Islamic golden age.
This regression couldnt happen in secularist state, therefore the secularist state is better. As I said before such regression might occur in the secularist state for other reasons...maybe... but at least secularist state is safe from such regression appearing for religious reasons.
if the argument is : Shut up because youre killikng people" then it means people are killing themselves just because someone is speaking... that means mental state of these people is at absolutely terrible level... that means we as a society and our health system has to do everything possible to better the mental state of these poor souls - with the only solution to such terrible mental state crisis being: banning trassexual operations as harmfull to the individual - and start treating transgender urges the way they should be medically - in the same category as depression... and start treating transsexual urges the way they should be medically - in the same cathegory as suicide.
the IPCC United Nations panels are realy not a good source of information. They are not trying to find causality between CO2 rise and temperature rises (so far none found... also the corelation itself is very shaky...) ...they are also not trying to find how much CO2 is man made and how much is natural process caused by sun and million other factors
The climatology itself is so far really not a science. Its just a proto-science... they dont have any scientifical methods that would help them to prove or disprove anything... they just measure some data and get scared about them... and the IPCC panels are part of how the fear is spread :P (Bjorn talked about something similar)
I get that Bjorn is using their data because its easy for him... he doesnt care about their non-sourced claims that everything is manmade... hes just trying to find solution to that problem regardless of who or what caused it :)
We build Freedom Of Speech Software. We champion free speech, individual liberty and the free flow of information online. All are welcome.