OK I've gone further into the video where Tim talks about the Bernie Bros.' conspiracy theory. It sounds plausible, but I have a caveat:
Now having a Biden/Buttigieg ticket is probably the BEST option the Dems have, but in this case Biden can no longer count on the Black vote. To which he'll probably lost in catastrophic fashion in urban centers as well.
I never take the Democratic Party at their word. As inept as they've been all along, hear me out:
My theory is that Pelosi will hold the articles lingering over the bulk of 2020 so that she negates any and all risks for any of the presidential candidate senators (Warren, Sanders) of being sequestered in the Senate for the Impeachment trial. McConnell has been on record that he wants a speedy trial (reports have verified that the Senate calendar for January has been completely cleared up for the Impeachment trial). That being said, once the articles are transmitted, she loses control of the narrative. She will refuse to transmit the articles until after a Democratic candidate has accepted the nomination (she's hoping it's Biden), after which point she will lobby it like a grenade into the Senate after the summer break, right before head to head debates start up. This way Impeachment will be fresh in everyone's mind, back in the news cycle, and the Senate will be forced then to kibosh it quickly, again building a part of the narrative that the GOP are cheats, scumbags and traitors to the Republic. The Senate acquits with little investigation, and the hope then becomes this builds a crescendo of anger similar to the 2018 blue wave after the Kavanaugh appointment. This, IMO, would be the absolute worst scenario for the Republicans. This would be far worse than getting the articles in January and supposedly dragging it out for 3 or 4 months. The GOP needs a political counter to this potential maneuver.
Anyone want to comment?
This message is a recording:
The Leftists Eat Their Own.
Here's a new twist on an old saying:
Pass Stupid Laws, Win Stupid Prizes!
This is all performative theater, I'm sure. This man has do so much harm to others. His actions have resulted in innocent people being censored, banned, intimidated, creeped-upon, harassed and flat-out sued under the guise of human rights. He has wrecked the businesses of at least five immigrant families that refused to give him a wax, and added insult to injury when those same people had to be dragged in court to defend themselves against his disgusting claims.
He should get serious mental help. But I don't pity him.
Carl Benjamin: "It's probably beneficial for women and certainly teenage girls, for them to have gender-segregated spaces, so I think that's a practice that we should continue, and to continue that practice, I think that we should have a firm definition of what a woman is."
Say it with me Carl: Well, Duh! Islam is Right about Women.
Some of you might think I'm being cheeky, but I'm dead serious here. You see, Islamic Law and Jurisprudence has ALREADY thought and articulated this viewpoint a long, long, long time ago. What is now becoming self-evident from an atheistic point of view was already well defined under Abrahamic religions.
Say it with me Carl: Well, Duh! slam is Right about Women.
Sure, elective procedure! Like here in Ontario, when you blow out your knee playing footy and you can't walk and need to be in a boot or in a wheelchair. Guess how long you're going to wait for that surgery? Days? Weeks? Try SEVERAL months. It'll teach you patience!
But surely, you say, if you live in a jurisdiction with universal health coverage it must be great to know that you can walk into any ER and get treated immedia...oh what's that you say? It can take you several hours of sitting on your ass and waiting? And there's only ONE ER doctor for the whole night shift? And you live in a metropolitan area where the amount of doctors is controlled by the Ontario Medical Association? And there's a scarcity in the number of doctors EVERYWHERE because it's government funded?
You don't say...
I mean just by the way it was written in the article ("It's Keeya, not Keya"), nothing is imparted onto the reader in terms of how to actually pronounce her name...
What's ironic is that her name is written down as "Keya", but she oftentimes corrects others and tells them her name is pronounced "Keeya"? How the hell does that make any sense? Then why don't you change the SPELLING of your name to "Keeya"???
Yep, this "Keya" character is insane in the membrane.
I, as an Muslim Arab, struggle with "Diversity is our Strength" mantra. Our blackface president Trudeau trots this out all the time. But he has never elaborated how that is. I think I know why: Because it's not readily or easily demonstrable.
Homogeneous communities tend to have very strong shared cultural norms and mores. When a foreign element enters inside this cohesive structure, it naturally introduces elements that may not be compatible within this structure. I mean, this happens in the Middle East all the time. As a result of the 2003 Iraq war, MILLIONS of Iraqis relocated to the rest of the Arab world. Millions landed in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt. You think those didn't have an impact on the natives' cultures? Of course they did. You just don't hear about it here in the west because it doesn't matter to us. But of course lives changed. Of course standards of living changed dramatically. And this happened to people that are Arabs, Muslims and share a very close geographic proximity to one another. YET, for many decades they lived in their own political (ethno)states.
Let's get real here. Just because AJ+ says there is a rise of nationalism in the US, doesn't mean the exact same thing doesn't happen elsewhere around the world. Heck, I was born in Kuwait, they literally have systemic racism enshrined in their laws.
A neocon endorsing cryptocurrency? Hm...