There are basically two different policy-approaches to the coronavirus problem: One is the passive approach, waiting for ‘herd immunity’ to develop naturally. And the other…

Did you know that people are trying to figure out WHY you are resisting mandatory masks and vaccines? It is because you are a pro-imperialistic, pro-neoconservative, neoliberal, "libertarian" who would rather see people die than allow the government to do something about it and force you to take common sense measures. According to the writer, sham historian, Eric Zuesse, "People who are in denial about coronavirus-reality avoid [coronavirus death] numbers like the plague. Perhaps they do that because, to their libertarian ideology, these numbers are “the plague.”" No, you buffoon! We know the deaths and infection numbers are inflated. We know the disease is not as deadly at fear monger make it out to be. We know that there is a universal cure. We know that hand sanitizer and UV light kills this virus. We know C19 is a political football, and nothing much else. We know that no one had to die! We oppose masks because a) they don't work b) they are unhealthy c) they are oppressive d) they foster unnecessary anxiety and fear We oppose vaccines because a) they don't work as well as theraputics like HCQ b) they contain poisons that weaken the immune system c) there is no vaccine for C19 d) the vaccine trials are killing people We oppose chipping because a) chips don't report one's current state of health b) my information is not for public consumption c) we like our privacy and don't want to be tracked d) we don't want the government to turn off our money if we disobey.

loading...

The Supreme Court handed a big win to the LGBT community Monday, ruling in a 6-3 decision that an employer who fires a worker for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act -- which already protected people from employer sex discrimination, as well as discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin.

This idea of having "protected classes" of people, especially centered on a chosen behavior, is anti-liberal (in the original sense of the term). Are we going to compel school districts or church to hire pedophiles and drag queens? Will photographers and wedding cake bakers have to serve satanists? Will natural girls and women be required to compete with transgender women in sporting events? Will restaurants and stores have to merge men's and women's restrooms again? Are we ever going to protect gun-owners, Republicans, or evangelicals from discrimination?

The point is, as Americans, we have a right to assemble freely with whomever we choose. We should not to have to hire or associate with people who's behavior is morally offensive or force gender absurdities upon people.


Edit History

2020-02-Mo 08:02:19 pm

This idea of having "protected classes" of people, especially centered on a chosen behavior, is anti-liberal (in the original sense of the term). Are we going to compel school districts or church to hire pedophiles and drag queens? Will photographers and wedding cake bakers have to serve satanists? Will natural girls and women be required to compete with transgender women in sporting events? Will restaurants and stores have to merge men's and women's restrooms again? Are we ever going to protect gun-owners, Republicans, or evangelicals from discrimination?

The point is, as Americans, we have a right to assemble freely with whomever we choose. We should not to have to hire or associate with people who's behavior is morally offensive or force absurdities upon people.

loading...

Yesterday President Trump signed a social media executive order that specifically mentioned Twitter. Twitter doesn't seem too concerned or scared though and nor should they be as many legal experts have weighed in and stated that this

Can't like it. Can't share it. The Information War is on!

loading...

According to reports the White House has a drafted an executive order to address social media censorship and put the FCC in charge of monitoring social media. Don't get excited. This is bad.

The point of the EO is to get social media companies to butt-out of people's conversations -- like a telephone call -- and stop the automated censorship algorithms without subjecting them to countless lawsuits for being "publishers" of those conversations -- like a newspaper. The fears of abusing CDA 230 protections are overblown.

loading...

Monday on CNN, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) argued President Donald Trump should not be taking hydroxychloroquine because he was "morbidly obese." | Clips

What anti-viral medication is Nancy going to take? Only her veterinarian knows for sure!

loading...

Fox Business Network host Neil Cavuto expressed shock over President Donald Trump's announcement Monday that he is taking hydroxychloroquine.

Cavuto has just shot himself in the foot.

loading...

Ji Seong-ho, elected to South Korea's National Assembly in April, said he believes there is a "99 percent" chance Kim Jong-un is dead.
loading...

Michael Levit said, "most individuals are immune to COVID-19 and pointed out that only 20% of the passengers on the Diamond Princess contracted the infection." This is good news. Only 70 million Americans will come down with Wuhan Flu, suggesting "only" 1.75 million might die. Get the Hydroxychloroquine out there and you will save 99%, with only 17,500 deaths, virtually none.

loading...

Call it for what it really is. Thought Crime.

loading...
Dissenter
connecting...