Why can't they make their own IP, Tim?!? I'll give you two reasons:
1) They're lazy. It's easier to try to just modify what the white man already built. (funny they want what the evil white man already has, isn't it?)
2) There is a bonus benefit. In addition to making it easier for them to modify what already exists and has a BUILT-IN audience, it also affords them the opportunity to ruin an existing property for the white man. (It's like tearing down the statues of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson - not saying Bond is equal to GW and TJ, just that the motive is the equivalent.)
"We haven't found the right language..."
"...a country with a deeply troubled racial past."
ALL identity politics - hey, black people ... over here black people ... your train is over here ... free food and free lodging this way ... you just need to work in the cotton fields for it.
THAT is what the Leftists think of black and brown people - and wamens.
Under Trump, the lowest recorded black unemployment rate ever ... EVER!!
Under Democratic rule, inner cities (the ancestral homeland of black America) are failing ... FAILING. All of them ... everywhere ... under ANY long-held Democratic rule ... FAILING.
Yeah, it's true. Now, that doesn't mean blacks are open-minded enough to recognize that fact and vote for Republicans and Trump, but it is most definitely true.
Tim, changing the constitution to eliminate 2A DOES NOT ... I repeat DOES NOT ... eliminate the right to keep and bear arms, because 2A doesn't grant the right to keep and bear arms.
It's no different from the First Amendment. Eliminating the 1A doesn't eliminate your right to free speech. All the BoRs does is explicitly tell the government they CANNOT mess with these areas of private life, among others.
But the rest of the constitution does not grant the Fed positive authority TO mess with free speech, private firearms, etc.
Our rights flow from God (or nature - however you want to think of it ... human rights). Our rights don't flow from government or the constitution. The constitution just orders the government to protect those rights, among all others.
Hahahaha ... UN soldiers. Believe me, the Blue Helmets don't want any part of those "conservative" "good old boys". Never in the history of the Blue Helmets will they have encountered such insurmountable odds as trying to take the guns away from "redneck" country boys.
Hahahaha ... UN soldiers. I nearly blew coffee all over my computer when I heard that.
You're wrong, Tim. Soros and many other Leftist groups ARE funding the caravans with the specific intent of "browning" America. YOU did stories last year where they talked to some of the "migrants" who were saying that groups were actively soliciting people - PAYING people - to join the caravan. They were telling people in Central America that the USA WANTED the "migrants" to come and had jobs waiting on them.
THAT is not "grassroots" caravans; THAT is Leftist activism with a specific agenda - displacing whites as the majority population in the country.
Diversity is good, right? Then why is there no active movement by the global governments to flood "black and brown" countries with white people?
Wow ... the Dimocrats have reached a point where there is absolutely no accusation or rhetoric they're not willing to throw out there with no more consideration than stepping on a bug.
What's illegal about surveilling Yovanovitch?
I wouldn't call Salon the InfoWars of The Left. I would call Salon, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, HuffPo, et al. as the National Inquirer of American "journalism".
The GAO "legal ruling" is insane partisan nonsense. It has already been shown that the president determines the timing of the delivery of aid authorized by congress UNLESS the aid authorization bill specifies a time for delivery.
And it can't be the withholding of the aid itself, because at least Trump approved the aid. Obama REFUSED military aid for Ukraine.
The GAO is supposed to be non-partisan. Clearly they're not.