First of all, an 8 year old can't live on their own. She's clearly older. Second, if she's legally an adult- you can't be charged with neglect for leaving her behind.
the real losers are the taxpayers who keep having to fund these absurd political games. these politicians aren't stupid. they know these laws won't pass constitutional muster. they just want to grandstand at the taxpayer's expense.
The federal government would literally need to spend 0 dollars and send in 0 troops to take back control of Commiefornia. All the feds would need to do is put an open season on leftists in California and you'd have plenty of volunteers.
Well, guess the whole Spanish language is problematic to these morons. Whenever you refer to a group of people, the masculine is used. Does that make them racist?
They can identify as a unicorn, why not as a conservative?
Too many girly boys upset they didn't get cut as a baby and too chicken shit to do it now. Study after study and real world experience shows that cut guys are better equipped for war, extended survivalist situations, and pleasing women. Sorry uncut guys- but you can always go and get it done now, if you didn't lack the balls.
Inflammatory skin conditions of the glans (balanitis) and foreskin (posthitis) are common in uncircumcised males of all ages. Related conditions include: lichen sclerosus, psoriasis, lichen planus, schorrheic dermatitis, and Zoon (plasma cell) balanitis. These conditions often present with itching, tenderness and pain, cause significant morbidity, can be challenging to treat medically and add to the burden of health-care costs. Reducing the prevalence of penile inflammation is therefore important. In this chapter we present a systematic review of the medical literature, focusing on balanitis, balanoposthitis and lichen sclerosus. We also consider the beneficial effect of male circumcision, which, by removing the foreskin, affords substantial protection against penile inflammation. The degree of reduction in prevalence of balanitis by circumcision was found to be 68% in a meta-analysis (OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.20–0.52). Another meta-analysis showed that balanitis is associated with a 3.8-fold increased risk of penile cancer (95% CI 1.6–9.1). Yeasts and other microorganisms accumulate under the foreskin and contribute to inflammation of the surrounding penile tissue. The prevalence of penile inflammatory conditions greatly exceeds the incidence of adverse events associated with circumcision procedures of 0.4% in infancy and 1.5% or more in older males, most adverse events being minor and easily treated. Because of the potential seriousness of penile inflammation and its consequences, especially in immunocompromised, diabetic and some other patients, the high lifetime incidence of penile inflammation and the strong protection afforded by circumcision, this simple, safe procedure, best performed early in infancy, should be more widely adopted.
Superstitions aside, a lot of Jewish law was actually very practical- don't eat pig meat (pork doesn't do well in the desert), only wear breathable fabrics(good idea in the hot desert), chop of your foreskin, (sweating in the desert causes infection in uncut guys.)
Your arguments are invalid.
Superstitions aside, a lot of Jewish law was actually very practical- don't eat meat (pork doesn't do well in the desert), only wear breathable fabrics(good idea in the hot desert), chop of your foreskin, (sweating in the desert causes infection in uncut guys.)
There ARE medical benefits. That's why the entire Chinese Army now mandates adult circumcision. Look up balanitis. Big problem for soldiers on the front line.