Are you shitting me?!
As of now, 6 hours after this video came out, Ghost of Tsushima is winning with 40% to last of us's 37%.
I don't know if this change is part of a broader trend, or a direct consequence of Mr. Obvious' reach. But if it's the latter, it makes me wonder how many gamers actually ever vote in these things if his audience can so quickly tip the scales.
"removed for violating youtube's community guidelines"
They've succeeded in turning gaming into Hollywood.
Now gaming won't represent the broader public who plays games, but an insular minority culture who lives according to their production: Developers, promoters, professional critics, and "cultural consultants."
Like the academy awards, game awards aren't nor shouldn't be a measure of commercial success, but the artistic accomplishments of the medium. But the people judging those "accomplishments" are a class unto their own, disjoint from other walks of life. Every year it will get worse until it isn't surprising; it will be seen as how things are "supposed" to be. "Oscar bait" will receive its video game equivalent. Like hollywood, journalism, and academia, perhaps the formation of such a class is an economic inevitability. Time to find a new hobby, I guess. Again.
Overall it's a pretty good refutation, especially the equation at the end. But it still has several misconceptions, probably fueled by the fact they're trying to rebut an hour and ten minute video in less than 20 minutes.
This video only looks at one county, while the original looks at 4. He doesn't make any mention of the hyperbolic effect that Dr. Shiva discussed, although that wasn't the main point. He asserts that the original video assumed that the number of people voting straight ticket would equal the number going down the line, that's not true. It's also irrelevant. The purpose is not to add or subtract percentages expecting to be able to conclude anything by the exact value. It's to compare proportions and look for relative trends between them.
A more complete video would graph the correlation between the percentages, the difference graph, compare the two side-by-side (their b value should be the same), and do so for all 4 counties.
It feels like this video was made quickly in an attempt to debunk the original, rather than completely explore the data.
The above video is a longer recording of this conference, wherein Clinton DOES show up.
Reuters is just fucking retarded titling the video this way and then cutting out the part that actually had Hillary in it.
And because they always disable comments, there's no way for viewers to correct the record.
It's like they WANT to sow distrust and division.
Damn, she got fat...
It would be beneficial to also have graphs for the sums of Trump and Biden's number distributions and the sums of all candidates distributions.
The cycle never stops. But its direction can be influenced considerably by one thing: genocide.
That's not an endorsement, just a fact people are too timid to speak of.
supposedly, this is the camwhore that Hunter Biden cybered with.
EDIT: It can't be true though, because the model information doesn't line up with the timeline of the laptop being obtained (back in December). It says she's 30 in the video, but that means she should be 31 now.
We build Freedom Of Speech Software. We champion free speech, individual liberty and the free flow of information online. All are welcome.