The editor of a journal that fell for a hoax defends his field. --------- Subscribe to our YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/reasontv Like us on Facebook: ...

I can see why this guy was the only one willing to do an interview, he's too dumb to realize what a scandal it is. Let's review his criticism of the hoaxers and his defense of academia:

The hoaxers didn't make the journals aware of their hoax.

The hoaxers made statements that "could be correct."

The stuff published in such journals isn't silly, it's like the respiration mechanism in an ant.

The reviewers were duped by made-up data.

Do we reflexively vilify white males? Well, how big a problem is it, is it worse than hunger?

Our journal is needed because once homosexuality was pathologized and now its not, so these things need to be discussed.

The hoaxers revealed these journals to be utter gibberish intended to affirm the ideological biases of a cult-like community. And the defense he gives is that learning is "questioning assumptions that are not traditional. So not being traditional, not being conservative, is part of the job of learning, to be more open to new ideas, which is what being a liberal is." In other words, they promote neo-Marxist, feminist, identity-politic gibberish in order to not be conservative.

Well, no wonder there's such a bias! What they do is education, whereas what conservatives and traditional types do is not education! The conservative and traditional people are to be instructed, not included! Sadly, the privileges of their heteronormative and patriarchal otherization blind them to the intersectional struggles of those who seek to break their matrix of dominance and expose the hegemony of their racism, sexism and bigotry, whether internalized or externalized, with concepts that smash white performativity and collapse the masculinist, capitalist presumptions that enslave us! What about that are you simple-minded, white, inbred dolts unable to understand??????

loading...
Set in 1945, in Pre-Independence India, Kalank is a tale of eternal love. Starring Varun Dhawan as Zafar Aditya Roy Kapur as Dev Chaudhry Sanjay Dutt as Balr...

I AM DISGUSTED BY THIS BLATANTLY ETHNONATIONALIST FILM!!!! RACCCCISM!!!!

At first I assumed this was a period piece depicting a fanciful version of 800 ad or something, then I realized it was modern. Electric lights. I AM SHOCKED. Where is the racial representation? No people of color in India in 1945??? Even in the recent Churchill biopic The Darkest Hour Churchill is shown going to the subway and talking to a BLACK MAN!!! It never happened in real life but that doesn't matter. IT IS THE MORAL THING. Not even ONE black person in this movie???? Not even ONE East Asian??? Where are the MEXICANS????? If I have learned one thing from media it is that even Thor's Valhalla MUST be of mixed ethnicity!!! WHY IS NOBODY CALLING THIS FILM OUT FOR ITS BLATANT ETHNONATIONALISM!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAXPIhnQocM

loading...

The egging comes as the Australian public calls for the The Independent Queensland senator to be booted from parliament in a petition with over 225,000 signatures.

Anning calling the murders tragic and horrific, saying "any form of violence can never be justified" becomes "Anning blames immigrants for shooting!"

Anning slapping a teenager who smashed an egg on his head becomes "Anning ATTACKS" and "Anning punches young man!"

Anyone, including Anning, who points out the obvious fact that Muslims are incompatible with Western civilization and that violence will only escalate if we don't recognize this fact, that becomes "controversial!" and "extremist!" and "supporting right wing terrorism!" and "hateful!" and "Neo-Nazi!" and "hate speech!" and "bigotry!" All of these hysterical distortions used in just this article.

I guess the only acceptable position is the globalist position that immigration must never be questioned. Expect more violence people, a lot of blood, a lot of death, a horror show as Western Civilization descends.

loading...
Queensland senator Fraser Anning punches teen after being egged while speaking to media in Melbourne. Watch full video to know more. The World is One News, W...

As usual, we can't have an adult conversation about immigration. Open borders for all Western nations is the only allowed opinion, anything else will be mischaracterized as "hate."

Anning said of the mosque shootings: "It's an unfortunate thing, a tragedy, but its going to be eventually accepted, or expected, that these things are going to happen. When people are getting attacked in their own..."

Weird that his full comment is almost always edited down, as if him saying its a tragedy humanizes him too much. Oh dear, remove that ten seconds of video!

Doesn't sound to me like he's advocating violence or hatred against Muslims. Sounds like he is predicting a bleak future based on trying to mix cultures that do not mix. There is plenty to be said about the cultural segregation that is occurring, the anti-white, anti-Western preaching that happens in some Mosques, and the violence committed by immigrants, offenses covered up or downplayed by the media. Of course a backlash is inevitable.

Do we want an escalation of violence across the Western world? Is censoring anything that diverges from the open borders position going to lessen the violence? How about the double-standard? Reporting crimes committed against immigrants by whites as "hate/evil/nazi/white supremacist!!!" while ignoring or downplaying immigrant crimes with meaningless drivel like "diversity is our strength!" Is that going to make us safer?

So if ten or twenty years from now violence is a constant threat across the Western world, if there have been thousands killed, will anyone apologize to those like Senator Anning for the smears and attacks on his character? Will we finally be having an adult conversation or will all Western nations be irredeemably transformed into places of murder and civil strife? How many bodies pile up before we fundamentally change the discourse regarding what it means to be a nation, a people, a religion, a race?

Ironic that if the scrawny white boy wanted to smash an egg on a leader's head in a majority Muslim country he'd get more than a slap on the wrist. Anyone living under Sharia law, which is in direct conflict with Western values, can find themselves convicted of what are essentially thought crimes, for participating in demonstrations, inciting sectarian strife, committing heresy or "disobeying a ruler." Punishments are severe. This kid would likely get his ass beat and thrown in jail... or worse. In other words, the Muslims create the kinds of authoritarian societies that we in the West have fought and died to avoid.

You want to point out that violence and conflict will escalate due to reckless immigration policies? You are smeared as a "white supremacist." The most basic facts, the most basic recognition of reality, is denounced everywhere as "hate."

The real hatred going on is a hatred for the peace, integrity, and long term stability of Western Civilization. It is a hatred for white people, Christianity, and liberal values like free speech and due process. It is a contemptuous disregard for the true tolerance that abides in Western nations and what preserving that tolerance actually requires, which includes borders and strict immigration restrictions, restrictions that exclude incompatible peoples.

Nothing will change until Western soil is as blood-soaked as the middle East, until the body count is in the thousands... or millions.

Ah, but keep up with the virtue signalling, you mindless twats.

loading...
An Australian senator who sparked outrage for blaming Muslim immigration for the New Zealand mosque shootings has been hit on the head with a raw egg. Report...

Comments disabled on this video. Why am I not surprised? You can find dozens of videos showing him getting hit by the egg, denouncing his comments as "anti-Muslim" but its hard to find what he actually said, even though its only a few seconds long. Typical truncating of the clip to promote a specific narrative.

As usual, we can't have an adult conversation about immigration. Open borders for all Western nations is the only allowed opinion, anything else will be mischaracterized as "hate."

Anning said of the mosque shootings: "It's an unfortunate thing, a tragedy, but its going to be eventually accepted, or expected, that these things are going to happen. When people are getting attacked in their own..."

Doesn't sound to me like he's advocating violence or hatred against Muslims. Sounds like he is predicting a bleak future based on trying to mix cultures that do not mix. There is plenty to be said about the cultural segregation that is occurring, the anti-white, anti-Western preaching that happens in some Mosques, and the violence committed by immigrants, offenses covered up or downplayed by the media.

Do we want an escalation of violence across the Western world? Is censoring anything that diverges from the open borders position going to lessen the violence? How about the double-standard? Reporting crimes committed against immigrants by whites as "hate/evil/nazi/white supremacist!!!" while ignoring or downplaying immigrant crimes with meaningless drivel like "diversity is our strength!" Is that going to make us safer?

So if ten or twenty years from now violence is a constant threat to everyone across the Western world, if there have been thousands killed, will anyone apologize to those like Senator Anning, for the smears and attacks on his character? Will we finally be having an adult conversation or will all Western nations be irredeemably transformed into places of murder and civil strife? How many bodies pile up before we fundamentally change the discourse regarding what it means to be a nation, a people, a religion, a race?

Ironic that if the scrawny white boy wanted to smash an egg on a leader's head in any majority Muslim country he'd get way more than a slap on the wrist. Anyone living under Sharia law, which is in direct conflict with Western values, can find themselves convicted of what are essentially thought crimes, for participating in demonstrations, inciting sectarian strife, committing heresy or "disobeying a ruler." Punishments are severe. This kid would likely get his ass beat and thrown in jail... or worse.

loading...

Tim is absolutely right that we require less censorship, not more. That's why I think we need to promote Gab and Dissenter as much as possible. We are heading toward civil war, though I think the timeline is more like 10 to 20 years for Europe and a bit longer for the USA.

Having said that, the identitarian left and right are not the same. At best one can say they both believe race is substantive and are willing to organize society on that basis, but even this isn't correct.

To the identitarian left race is only substantive if it affirms non-whites, when it promotes non-white interests in contra-distinction to whites, when it promotes the victim narratives that create resentments against whites. When considering Caucasians the concept of race becomes irrelevant, it becomes "unscientific." Any consideration of racial solidarity among whites is considered evil.

This hypocrisy, this contradiction, can only be reconciled when you realize that the left identitarians use race to fracture and cause dissent in white, Western nations. In this way they believe they can break white hegemony and create a new, socialist, egalitarian utopia. It's fair to say that they either want enough political power to force their views or they want to "bring down the system," which they call "patriarchy" and "white supremacy" and "capitalism," until such chaos ensues that they can exploit the situation to forge a new society.

As for the right identitarians, they are not trying to impose a universalist egalitarianism. They are nationalists who do not begrudge other races living their own lives in their own way in their own space. They believe themselves the true champions of diversity, for only separation can sustain the unique genetic inheritance of each race.

Most of the identitarian right, even the most shameless neo-nazis, advocate for less intervention by the white, Western world into the affairs of other countries, including the violent wars that have murdered so many non-whites. They don't want a global revolution led by a global elite, the same global elite with their international banks that manipulate currencies and foment wars.

The right identitarians predict that civil war is inevitable, but rather than blaming disaffected whites who are seeing Western Civilization degraded before their eyes, they blame the globalists who have allowed incompatible peoples to flood into Western nations.

So the left and right identitarians are not "two sides to the same coin." To reduce them both to thinking race is relevant is trivial; it completely misses the extreme differences in their assessments and their solutions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvlU6cVw3PY

loading...
Absolutely despicable. Kill count up to 49 now. There are things even more despicable.

I find it interesting that when Muslims commit a terrorist attack in a Western nation against white people the media narrative is: "Don't blame all Muslims, Islam is a religion of peace! Stop the alt right/nazi/white supremacist haters from dividing us! We must come together! Diversity is our strength!"

When a white person commits a terrorist attack against Muslims in a Western nation the narrative is basically the same but with policy prescriptions attached: "We must stop the alt right/nazi/white supremacist haters by controlling their hate speech online, changing gun laws so this won't happen again..." and so on.

Either way the globalist establishment gets their message out, which is always one that identifies the problem as the white "extremists." Never do we have a broad, sensible debate about the effect of letting millions of incompatible peoples into Western nations. Never do we discuss the inevitability of tensions rising across the Western world, of an endless cycle of violence being perpetrated from every side, of an eventual civil war and blakanization, all consequences resulting directly from reckless immigration policies and uncontrolled borders.

Also, where is the discussion about how the neo-conservatives have advocated for and executed senseless, divisive, violent conflicts throughout the middle East? Even most conservatives have quietly come to their senses about the counterproductive results of the Iraq war and other conflicts, but have we actually had the public reckoning, addressing the full cost in money and lives?

Ryan makes an excellent point, it is the disaffected whites who have been promoting the sensible solutions to this rising violence. Yet these disaffected whites are the first who are blamed, they are vilified as those who "hate," as if they are the nexus of this problem.

It's sick. The global ruling class cares nothing for either the Muslim world or Western nations. Their only consistent, protective, positive concern is for Israel.

loading...

Elizabeth Warren defended capitalism as a "force for good", while also pointing out some flaws, in a new interview.

Here is AOC's quote about capitalism: "The most important thing is the concentration of capital and it means that we seek and prioritize profit and the accumulation of money above all else and we seek it at any human and environmental cost. That is what that means. To me that ideology is not sustainable and cannot be redeemed."

This overgrown child, this pompous nitwit, has no business pontificating on anything. Even for a socialist that is a pathetic definition of capitalism.

Capitalism is better defined as economic freedom, for it is the only system that advocates for free exchange between private parties. There is no third party that intrudes itself upon the affairs of private citizens, claiming the right to extract resources for the sake of "doing good." This third party is an interloper, usually the government, and it must use force. Capitalism is about voluntary transactions, voluntary contracts, and not using force.

This contrast between the voluntary nature of capitalism and the authoritarianism of all other systems should be at the heart of every simple definition of capitalism. In fact, capitalism is a misleading moniker, the system would be more accurately called 'voluntaryism'- or something of the sort.

I may not agree, but I do respect that people have reservations about the limits of capitalism, believing that a third party should "correct" for capitalist abuses, which entails a "legitimate" use of force; but that is simply the start of an important debate.

However, to begin with a biased and inaccurate definition of capitalism like "it's about money and not caring about the people or environment" is to start in bad faith, to collapse any reasonable discussion.

In AOC's case, I think it is simply ignorance. This is the shit they teach in "higher" education. But the truly disturbing thing? AOC has a degree in economics! I repeat, this nitwit has a degree in economics, yet this is how she defines capitalism.

When asked about the economic impossibilities of her Green New Deal, as in "how do we pay for it?" AOC said, "how do we pay for anything?" Economics degree, folks. Utterly disgraceful.

loading...

The title itself is enough to hurt the sensibilities of an SFW snowflake. "A Mexican, A Palestinian and a Black try their Luck at Resisting Arrest" You are saying outright that these people acted like morons and paid the price. You have selected, with utterly contemptible and racist bias, three "people of color" as your examples. Hence racism. Gotcha, hater. Promoting violence against a whole group of people. Blam!

How about doing a video about gab and the new Dissenter extension? The Dissenter browser extension allows for an uncensored comment section on any video. Let's attack this absurd censorship with some free speech!

loading...
Esther’s Follies, the SNL of Austin, takes their wildly popular Beto sketch from the stage to the streets to rally support for Beto O’Rourke. Early voting st...

As a proud troll of the intertubes I find this music video untrollable. No fun raping a body that is already mangled and dead and covered in flies. Just watch it for yourself, such a monstrosity doesn't need trolls.

loading...
Dissenter
connecting...