That's it? That's where you end this ridiculous article? "It is a choice to live in a libertarian society with a deregulated and degenerate culture." Don't you mean it's a choice to live in a free society or a totalitarian one? The choice to live in a society where you can freely access things others might deem "sinful" on the internet but also speak the truth about the State, about crime, about your quality of life, about anything.
Ah, you have the "choice" to allow a supreme authority to "protect" you from making your own moral choices on matters some deem "sinful" so they will simultaneously gain the power to "protect" you from anything else they deem a "threat to the people."
Race realism is infected with this kind of authoritarian cancer because most race realists have no real understanding of the classical liberal tradition. It's beyond their weak, emotional minds to accept that race is real and also that authoritarianism is bad. Fight to have a space for your race, then fight to make sure you are allowed to live in freedom in that space, including making your own moral choices. There isn't an alternative, really, unless you want some oligarchy that pretends to be a superior aristocracy deciding how you should live, where you should go, what you can say, etc.
Additionally, this fight to make internet porn illegal is either an intentional strategy to divide the right and hopefully gain more totalitarian control for the globalists, or certain moral nannies on the right are so stupid they are creating this divide and willfully handing more control to the globalists.
But please, keep dismissing people with "Okay, Coomer" and virtue signalling. They do that kind of moral posturing very well on the left already. On the left they promote environmental hysteria, which is conveniently buttressed by authoritarian legislation to give more control to the globalists. We on the right must do our part, find something we can virtue signal about that will also create moral hysteria and give more control the globalists. Get to it, puritans!
So let me get this straight. Her co-star was from a Nigerian family that moved to England. Then he got money to pursue acting. How is that good for England? At least the colonizers were spreading useful aspects of civilization, they didn't get things when they arrived but they gave a lot. We tend to forget about all the colonizers gave to the colonies, for that would make the mean white people look like they did something good. But they gave a lot, from modern sanitation to sturdy architecture and civil engineering to advanced medical and agricultural technologies, etc. However, in the modern era a Nigerian family moves from a nation known for having people with low intelligence, then they immediately take resources from their new country. Apparently it's the responsibility of England to support some Nigerian kid's acting career? And naturally, if you question this, then you are some kind of evil bigot. What a joke. No wonder Western Civilization is under threat of collapsing.
Using the law to compel your neighbor to obey your morality is the bane of civilization. It has been the cause of far more grief than the consequence of the various sins that people want to police. Once you make government the arbiter of your personal morality every person who thinks they know how their neighbor should behave must now fight over government to assure their morality prevails. This sort of authoritarianism is oppressive and provokes endless violence as people defy the authority. Classical liberalism resolved this problem by making almost all moral decisions a matter of personal moral choice, removing the role of government as a priest (or Marxist ideologue) who can use force.
Disheartening that just as we are peaking with the neo-Marxist abuses of government to enact their morality, from affirmative action and diversity laws to their various attacks on free speech to their intent to take away private gun ownership to their many environmentally-inspired laws, the left has a long list of moral reasons why they must impose their authority on all of us. Now the right, who has given us decades of pointless, ineffective and expensive drug and sex laws, is doubling down on their own authoritarian bullshit.
The unintended consequences of this one are particularly frightening. Of course the anti-pornography laws will be used to control the internet and will be abused by government to target political speech, to target those who defy the usual powerful interests. Of course such anti-pornography laws will only shift the demand to more nefarious corners of the internet and give power to criminal elements. An I.D. check is ridiculous and won't work.
The race war has already begun but only one side is fighting. White people haven't woken up to the new reality that non-whites seek their demise and replacement. At the moment it's a race war where non-whites and self-loathing white liberals are systematically dismantling the power and prestige of white males. Meanwhile white males continue to genuflect to a culture that hates them, insisting they are not racist even as they face racial attacks from non-whites. At some point racial consciousness will return to white people. Whites will realize they are being attacked as a racial group and will finally start to defend themselves as a racial group. Hopefully at that point it will still be possible to create white ethno-states without too much bloodshed.
I love how they smear him as "racist" and "sexist" and "homophobic" and then give heavily edited, cherry-picked examples. Why not give us a broader context with larger quotes? How about letting him speak to the specific allegations? Oh gosh, there's just no time! Attention Deficit Disorder media must throw their shit over the wall and run to the next manufactured controversy! No time!
Funny how they chose Lana Del Rey to do music for this movie. This is a woman who wrote a song called 'Fucked my Way Up to the Top." In another song called 'Cola" she explicitly talks about Harvey Weinstein. "Harvey's in the sky with diamonds / And it's making me crazy / All he wants to do is party with his pretty baby." Hmm, wonder if 'Charlie's Angel's' shows how women can fuck fat, hideous troll Jews in the entertainment industry to get what they want. One of those "sneaky" messages to help the young girls learn what girl power really means.
I could beat any of those Charlie's Angels to death using only my erect penis. If I want to see a fantasy of women who beat the shit out of grown, healthy adult men I would watch fetish porn.
Oh, the irony of closing the comment section. Must be that contempt for libertarianism that Tucker was talking about.
I love Tucker, he's the best thing in mainstream news. He is, however, an idiot on economics and libertarianism. In fact, the very problems he cites are best resolved by "libertarian" solutions, yet he shits on libertarian solutions. He has a moronic streak of authoritarianism in him, and he justifies his authoritarianism on the basis of the presumed moral superiority of his conservative views. That is to say, he mirrors the left, trying to impose his morality through force of government. Liberty rejects all forms of authoritarianism.
In fact, if you add a respect for borders and race realism libertarianism is essentially the views of Jefferson and Madison, the founding principles of the nation. Quite unfortunate how even conservatives have betrayed these principles.
I love Tucker, he's the best thing in mainstream news. He is, however, an idiot on economics and libertarianism. In fact, the very problems he cites are best resolved by "libertarian" solutions, yet he shits on libertarian solutions. He has a moronic streak of authoritarianism in him, and he justifies his authoritarianism on the basis of the presumed moral superiority of his conservative views. That is to say, he mirrors the right, trying to impose his morality through force of government. Liberty rejects all forms of authoritarianism.
Well said, it's a problem that is finally dawning on millions of white people. Multi-ethnic societies are inherently dysfunctional and anti-democratic. The multi-ethnic agenda is primarily an attack on white people, for the concept of racism is all about disenfranchising white people in favor of non-whites. Hopefully white people will wake up to the catastrophe on our doorstep for things are about to get very ugly across the West. Western Civilization is literally hanging in the balance.
Ah, David Frum. The liberal turned neo-conservative, former speech-writer for George W. Bush, shameless propagandist for globalists and the military industrial complex.
My neo-conservative brother encouraged me to read to 'An End to Evil'. That book was so offensive in its lies, its distortions, its shameless manipulation of data. David Frum and (((Richard Perle))) shamelessly promoted the policy positions of the deep State and the establishment. They helped do the dirty work that pushed America into conflicts that were not in our interest, widely recognized now as costly mistake.
Yet here he is, predictably an anti-Trump propagandist. After all, the establishment isn't about left or right, Republican or Democrat, it never was. The establishment is about protecting the union between the Federal government and big banks, big military and big corporations. The role of guys like Frum is to promote the interests of the establishment, to fleece the taxpayers for endless subsidies and bailouts and wars that serve military contractors and foreign nations (eg Israel) instead of helping average Americans.
Frum just keeps right on going, doesn't skip a beat. It's apparent from this article that Trump's disruption of the establishment is inspiring Frum to do what he does best, create artful lies. He's so good at it! What a magnificent smear merchant he is!