"America's answer to the white man is more diversity, which is to say, take power away from the white man."-Every race hustler ever.
Remember folks, anti-racism is just code for anti-white. The irony is that non-whites use the charge of racism to dispossess whites.
Hey Tim, a few reasons why you shouldn't be "centrist" or leftist:
1) You understand enough economics to know that mere economic activity is not "helping the economy." It's called the Broken Windows Fallacy, wherein you only look at what was done with some expenditure as opposed to what could have been done had those funds remained in private hands. This is one of the most common economic mistakes, one that is never properly rebutted because it augments the power of the government. If it seems like all the economic activity associated with the 'Green New Deal' is just parasitism on the economy in the service of a bureaucratic mess then you are correct. The positive economic results of the original New Deal is one of the great American economic myths.
2) You realize that almost everything the government does is inefficient and wasteful. What we need government to do, like protect against force and fraud, is also done incompetently. But it's no wonder, the "cooperative" government model turned Washington into a secular Vatican City long ago, where the spoils system of subsidies and special legislation for banks, big agriculture, big education, big welfare, the military industrial complex, etc., drowned out the legitimate purposes of government.
3) You realize that liberty is better than legislating morality by use of government force. This used to be 'classical liberalism' but now most classical liberals associate with the right, and for good reason. The right has its authoritarianism, and we still endure their wasteful, inefficient drug and sex laws, but the left is far worse when it comes to legislating morality. The left are the new totalitarians.
There, just three reasons you should stop your buffoonish "I'm a centrist" position and start calling yourself a classical liberal and associate yourself with the liberty-loving right more than the idiot, authoritarian, socialist left.
"I am against all racism, all identitarianism," says Tucker Carlson, Sargon, Jordan Peterson, et al. And so the white race was destroyed as non-whites ignored the pleas of "anti-racist" whites to pretend that "race doesn't matter." After all, these whites who insist on individualism are racist keepers of a racist status quo, one that must be abolished so non-whites can "have their place." Where is the place of non-whites? Populating and controlling all white spaces, of course.
When will whites finally wake up to two things:
1) Race is real and race matters. The races evolved to share traits either exclusively or in different proportions, an evolution that took hundreds of thousands of years of geographic separation.
2) Humans are tribal. Even if racial differences were insubstantial (and they are not) human beings cannot help but be tribal. One of the most obvious distinctions that compel people to unify or divide is race. Preaching an abstract individualism will not change this impulse that most humans have. We can either work with this tribal impulse of humans or we can fight in vain against it. Fighting the human tribal instinct is like fighting against the natural religiosity of humans, or fighting against the tendency for one to sacrifice for ones own family more than strangers, it will never work.
Currently white people either submit to the demands of non-whites, becoming an "ally" in the destruction of white hegemony and representation, or they deny race altogether, saying "we're all individuals," and "race is entirely irrelevant, it is immoral to identify yourself or anyone by race!" As if humans are interchangeable abstractions, divorced from the very real biology that shaped us.
Both of these approaches guarantee the destruction of the white race. For what will all the Petersons and Tuckers and Sargons say when Britain and the USA are majority non-white and it becomes an established fact that non-whites seek to exert power over whites, that non-whites seek the active displacement of whites? Will they say "oops" when they live in the violent, dysfunctional shithole that was inevitable when too many whites decided race "doesn't matter"?
If white people do not identify as a race and defend their racial interests it is all over. Everything our ancestors bequeathed to us will be overrun by non-white barbarians, who, in spite of their "anti-racist" rhetoric are virulent racists, seeking their own racial power over white people. Any white person who is not willing to embrace a white identity and fight for it is facilitating the destruction of the white race.
The doublespeak is truly Orwellian. Racial identity for me but not for thee. All peoples mixing with whites is what whites are expected to support. Whites are also expected to support the right of non-whites to identify with their own race and protect their own racial interests. Jews especially need to have their identity protected, for they are a victimized people with a long, noble history.
If the globalists have their way whites will be extinct within a couple centuries, with virtually all whites being mixed with other races. But there will still be Asians and black Africans and Mestizos and Semites and Jews to mock us for our weakness and naivete.
Identifying first and foremost as a global citizen is yet another ploy to rob white people of our racial identity. We are the most susceptible to this idealism and we have the most to lose.
What does it mean to identify with the globe as your community? It means nothing.
It doesn't mean you inherit the globe, it only means you abandon that small part of it bequeathed to you by your ancestors. Such a global identification is unnatural and meaningless and will only increase the rootlessness of white people.
The anti-white agenda must be resisted on every level.
The insanity is reaching disorienting proportions. Western Civilization has been seized by mass hysteria. Civil war may be inevitable at this point.
After all, what would it take to avert the catastrophe at this point? It would take the USA sending millions of illegals back, and not just the criminals. It would take the UK and Europe sending millions back, rounding them up and returning them to their place of origin.
Can you imagine the hysterical comparisons to NAZIs and Jews if people were rounded up and forcibly removed? It won't happen, even though the survival of Western Civilization depends on it.
We're not even close to having the political will to deport millions over the next few years. Instead, a new status quo is being established. It is a status quo that will bring constant conflict, division and economic strain. Twenty years from now people will barely remember how safe and prosperous Western nations used to be. They will watch clips of what Paris and London and Los Angeles used to be like and marvel at how clean and pleasant they once were.
We are setting the stage for violence to sweep the West. Millions will die. There will be the very real possibility that the European peoples will never recover. We will be bred out of existence and lose our civilizations. The rest of the world will cheer, even though what replaces white, Western nations will be far inferior in every way. "At least it is our home now," they will say.
We must be careful not to derail our hopes for political solutions because of unnecessary economic blunders. A bust in the economy on Trump's watch would mean Trump takes the blame. That would increase the likelihood of a backlash and we cannot afford to have the left in power. The left have gone completely insane.
Well, this is infuriating. I doubt Trump is facilitating the corrupt banking system intentionally. It's more likely that he is ignorant as to why and how it is corrupt, and why alternatives like bitcoin are healthy for the economy.
I think we can safely assume all these people are guilty. Wait, what? Are you telling me Barbara Walters wasn't pegging nine-year-old boys in the basement of a Miami mansion? She's right there in his contacts!
Watched an MSNBC report on Epstein yesterday, the entire thing was about Epstein's ties to people in the Trump administration. Not a word about the many Democrats with ties to Epstein or the flight logs of the 'Lolita Express', which had Bill Clinton flying regularly, and conveniently leaving his secret service behind when he did.
I love the way they fabricate history by filling ancient Greece with people who look Semitic and African. Recently DNA confirmed that the ancient Greeks were basically equivalent to modern Southern Europeans, though you wouldn't know it because the headline on this is always distorted to draw attention to the fact modern Greeks share DNA with the ancients. Yes, of course they do. That's a trivial conclusion of the DNA tests. However, the ancient Greeks were more exclusively like Southern Europeans than the admixture you see in Greece today. You'd think the latter would be the headline, but that would seem rasssssissssssss...