Wow, this hit piece belongs in the opinion section - talk about media bias in reporting!!!
I don't think he should be let off this easy. We know this happens ALL THE TIME with their 'anonymous witnesses' and alleged informants. The courts need to start making an example of these folks, not letting them get away with a slap on the writs and some half-assed retraction. Lately, it seems that 'slander now, apologize later' is the MO of the MSM - and I am tired of seeing them get away with it.
If Obama had a son.....
Typical lib - everthing is ALWAYS someone else's fault, and feelings overrule fact.
As if the article wasn't biased enough in its attempt to exempt the ironically-named 'anti-fascists' - the glossary of terms at the end certainly removed any doubt which side they were cheering on. So here we have the Progressive media and their ANTIFA brown-shirts doing their best to label anything they disagree with as racist, and using that label to justify their violence. My question is, if ANTIFA's cause is so righteous - why do they cover their faces? When I see videos of marchers with black bandannas over their faces - my first thought is militant muslims.
What the police SHOULD be doing is removing the masks from the ANTIFA terrorists. They act just like their Muslim counterparts, and should be exposed!
I didn't know that the First Amendment allowed people to wear masks while they exercise their first amendment rights. In most NORMAL (ie not bleeding heart liberal) states, wearing masks to terrorize the public is AGAINST THE LAW!
what you should be doing is removing the masks from the anarchist thugs taking over your streets. 'Peaceful' protesters don't hide their faces - unless they plan on committing crimes. Or, maybe you've been told to help them out?
Guess this proves it was never about her grandmother - it was all about going to Israel to show her ass! Should have let her leave, then revoked her passport while in the air!
Tom sure seems to have an unhealthy obsession with sodomy.