Can the statues survive napalm? Because I have an idea...
Y'know I'm not a huge fan of using violence to achieving my goals but the second the first Jesus statue comes down, it's time for another fucking Crusade. Leftists get rounded up and burned at the fucking stake. Fuck 'em.
Jefferson inherited his slaves and tried to change the Virginia Constitution so he could legally free them because he legally could not. You never hear about that, though.
Well it's about time! European-American Barrel has gotten away with its racist name for far too long!
"... decide whether you want to entrust your safety to a squadron of BLM-approved social workers, or to the cold steel of an AR-15."
AR-15, no question.
Honestly, I'm down for this. Even if these "real women" are models, they're actually attractive and it shows women can be sexy without looking like a bulimic supermodel. I would rather have a curvy, 5' 8", 135-140lb Christian conservative woman who is mentally stable and wants children than a model with no hips, a flat belly, and big tits who is only in that position because of her blowjob skills.
No. You can't. The only person you can trust to keep you safe is you. Arm up, watch plenty of YouTube videos on Krav Maga and Systema, and learn how to be alert in situations. Aside from that, everything is out of your control.
Finally. They're choosing the correct targets. I'm all for protesting, even if it turns violent, so long as you target the correct people. In this case, the correct targets are the sensationalist media that stoke the fires, the politicians (AKA mafiosos) who create laws that keep your people in the ghettos, and their mafia enforcers (the police) who keep your people in the ghettos. Small businesses and innocent bystanders are NOT the correct targets and thus should be left alone.
I also get that if you want to make an omelet you gotta break some eggs. Just break all the right ones and if you do happen to break the wrong ones, break as few as possible.
The whole argument about social services and people getting what they paid into the system is refuted by 1 thing: Inflation. Things in the future will always cost more than they do now. So, unless you paid far, far more than the current cost of social services in the present, you are reliant on future generations to pay for your shit. If you don't have children, the money will run dry and you will die of otherwise preventable causes.
There are 2 solutions (and changes in the system) to prevent this inevitability without having 2.1 children per female: Completely destroy ALL social service programs so people can keep their own money and spend it how they please or put an age cap on social services so the reducing population can sustain the aging population. That's it. No social security/Medicare/Medicaid/etc. or senicide.
Adults above the age of 23 who don't have children shouldn't be able to reap social services from taxpayer money. Simple as that.