The police officers who failed to tackle the Muslim grooming gang scandals are still in their jobs, overseeing the rape of English girls. Follow me on Bitchu...

You don't have the right to be a police officer. If you know that a blind eye was turned for 30 years but can't point to any officer involved, then you all have to go. At this point I would rather have 'right wing hate groups' patrolling the streets than the British police.

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

What is the sensible response to the mass rape of thousands of girls? What is the sensible response to your government covering it up and letting the perpetrators go free? What is the sensible response to those in power demonizing and silencing those trying to speak out?

A sensible response goes beyond a sternly written letter.


Edit History

2020-39-Th 02:39:30 am

What is the sensible response to the mass r_pe of thousands of girls? What is the sensible response to your government covering it up and letting the perpetrators go free? What is the sensible response to those in power demonizing and silencing those trying to speak out? A sensible response goes beyond a sternly written letter.

2020-39-Th 02:39:46 am

What is the sensible response to the mass rape of thousands of girls? What is the sensible response to your government covering it up and letting the perpetrators go free? What is the sensible response to those in power demonizing and silencing those trying to speak out? A sensible response goes beyond a sternly written letter.

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Something to remember is that the airstrike took place in Iraq, not Iran. Suleimani was in Iraq to coordinate and give aid to the militia groups that are likely responsible for the attack on the Baghdad embassy.

There was no violation of Iranian airspace. There was no strike against any official Iranian military operation. There was no violation of Iranian sovereignty. Suleimani got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and paid the price for it.


Edit History

2020-38-Sa 02:38:48 am

Something to remember is that the airstrike took place in Iraq, not Iran. Suleimani was in Iraq to coordinate and give aid to the militia groups that are likely responsible for the attack on the Baghdad embassy. There was no violation of Iranian airspace. There was no strike against any official Iranian military operation. There was no violation of Iranian sovereignty. Suleimani got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and paid the price for it.

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Looks like cultural pedophilia has a permanent place in the UK. Congrats on the enrichment

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

The officer was far too aggressive given that he stopped the vehicle for a broken taillight. Didn't need to pull his gun, didn't need to be verbally aggressive, didn't need to use pepper spray and didn't even need to put hands on. If no important information was left out of the description, the officer's conduct was completely unacceptable and he has no business wearing the badge.

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

When it comes to regulation of porn on social media, it should be something the user decides to enable. A simple opt in option after confirming you are 18 is sufficient. The same should apply for all potentially disturbing (violent) content or even political content (without the age gate). Every social media site should allow you to filter your own experience.

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

It’s not even prevailing legal theory that the President can be impeached for any reason Congress decides. That is just the broadest possible interpretation of Congress’s power, and is the interpretation that the media has been spoon feeding to us. No, what would likely happen if Trump was both impeached and removed, based on something he was within his legal authority to do, is that impeachment would be taken to the Supreme Court and the court would have to rule over the definition of high crimes and misdemeanors. Considering the fact that both terms have long standing and historic definitions that shock have criminal implications, the likely ruling would be that a President can’t be impeached without committing a crime, or at the very least can’t be impeached for exercising his Constitutionally enumerated powers.

Legal Eagle is known for using the broadest possible legal interpretations and the most narrow possible legal interpretations when it suits him. Just look at his video on the border wall.

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Welcome to the memory hole.

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

One of the issues with Kierkegaard's framing of ethics and morality has is that it assumes the perfect rationality of man, as well as perfect knowledge. This assumption demonstrates Kierkegaard's greatest flaw; hubris. He doesn't account for his own limitations as a human being and therefore over estimates the ability of any man to be the arbiter of his own morality.

Kierkegaard was a moral realist, specifically believing that moral truths were passed down by God. However, he was different than his contemporaries in believing God can only be known through faith and that each person must come to know God through their own experience. The issue that this causes is that it puts the existence and nature of God outside of something that can be discussed and debated. By putting God outside of what can be debated, you put morality outside of what can be debated as well. This wouldn't be a problem if Kierkegaard was right and at least some men had perfect knowledge and were capable of perfect reasoning, but we know that there exists no perfect man.

Kierkegaard's influence on moral philosophy could be argued to have sparked some of the twentieth centuries greatest evils; communism and fascism. As demonstrated in the video, it is very easy to draw and ends justifies the means ethic based on one's own moral certainty.

loading...
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Murder seems like the wrong charge here. Negligent homicide would have been more appropriate.

loading...
Dissenter
connecting...