When Donald Trump began to claim presidential immunity from criminal prosecution related to his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss, many legal analysts ABC News spoke with considered it a weak argument. "It was surprising to hear, at least from some of the justices, the possibility that a president could somehow commit criminal misconduct for which they could never be held liable in court," Michael Gerhardt, a constitutional expert at the University of North Carolina, told ABC News. "That's exactly the part that I think most of the American public is going to find fairly incredulous," said David Schultz, a professor at the University of Minnesota and national expert in constitutional law.
Breaking
Cohen's testimony on cross unraveled his claims about Trump's motivations, a phone call he previously alleged, and his collusion with Bragg....
“You’re taking down the symbol of the cross, the symbol of the Catholic faith, where 99% of Poles are Catholic.”...
loading...