I think the VP said the quiet part out loud. We really DO need to protect the vaccinated because they are at a much higher risk of a serious illness now in multiple ways.
When it comes to "vaccines" they always talk about the need to protect the vaccinated by forcing or otherwise convincing the unvaccinated to take it.
When it comes to "vaccines" they always talk about the need to protect the vaccinated by forcing unvaccinated to take it.
The First Hoe is far too stupid to comprehend that vaccines create immunity, and where there is no immunity created, that means the protocol is NOT A VACCINE.
"If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I'll be the first in line to take it, absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I'm not taking it," --- Harris said.
That's what I've been saying, if the vax doesn't protect the vaccinated, what's the point of getting vaccinated?
Here's how I best understand it. The vax IS NOT a vax at all, but a shot - like the flu shot (not the flu vaccine). The vaxxed and unvaxxed alike can get infected with the COVID-19 virus; the vaxxed and unvaxxed alike can transmit the virus, infecting others. So the only "real" benefit to getting the jab is a personal one, not societal. Research (if we can even trust the research at this point) shows that the vaxxed can still get infected but are likely to have a milder case than an unvaxxed person.
That question (why do the unvaccinated have a responsibility to protect the Filly vaccinated?) is the one that flummoxes the entire edifice of the "vaccination obsessed" and induces either an exhibition of catatonic discombobulation interrupted by frequent utterings of "umms" and "arrghs" searching for an answer or to produce a five minute burst of "'verbal diarrhea" without providing an answer to that simple direct question. It is NOT a vaccine if it does not confer immunity, the primary purpose of vaccination, or it is treating the wrong disease!. With their demonstrated liability to get infect (or reinfected and worse still to infect others, the fully vaccinated themselves are arguably a far greater LETHAL threat to the unvaccinated, than vice versa.
The vaccinated don't need "protection" because they're protected by the vax. Why is this simple medical fact so confusing to the Dems that claim the "follow the science?" Why do these science-screamers not comprehend science?
Why do you need to protect the vaccinated? Sure sounds like fraud.
["By vaccinating the unvaccinated, increasing our testing and masking, and protecting the vaccinated, we can end this pandemic. ]
What did the lowest polling Democrat Candidate say?