We may well want to go back and re-look the right to privacy that was never included in the Constitution if we can throw off our new masters.
Snip: He trained the facial recognition algorithm to accurately guess a person's political view with an accuracy rating of about 72%. To do this, the researcher trained an algorithm with over one million profiles from social media websites across the US, UK, and Canada.
"Political orientation was correctly classified in 72% of liberal-conservative face pairs, remarkably better than chance (50%), human accuracy (55%), or one afforded by a 100-item personality questionnaire (66%). Accuracy was similar across countries (the U.S., Canada, and the UK), environments (Facebook and dating websites), and when comparing faces across samples. Accuracy remained high (69%) even when controlling for age, gender, and ethnicity," he said.
Was a time that measuring skulls would show evidence considered indicative of a criminal personality. And it was suggested people should be locked up based on that 'indicator'.
If they find Xi Jinpings' shit on your nose, your a lib!
You gotta wonder if in the future people will be deplatformed for merely not looking like a shitlib.
Wow I must be a scientist also, looking at their face is easy, I can smell them.
So can I. If you have soyface, a neckbeard, problematic glasses or unnaturally colored hair, the chances are you are a degenerate leftist.
Stanford Scientist Can Tell If You're A Liberal Just By Looking At Your Face
We may well want to go back and re-look the right to privacy that was never included in the Constitution if we can throw off our new masters.
Snip: He trained the facial recognition algorithm to accurately guess a person's political view with an accuracy rating of about 72%. To do this, the researcher trained an algorithm with over one million profiles from social media websites across the US, UK, and Canada.
"Political orientation was correctly classified in 72% of liberal-conservative face pairs, remarkably better than chance (50%), human accuracy (55%), or one afforded by a 100-item personality questionnaire (66%). Accuracy was similar across countries (the U.S., Canada, and the UK), environments (Facebook and dating websites), and when comparing faces across samples. Accuracy remained high (69%) even when controlling for age, gender, and ethnicity," he said.
It's very easy to pick out a progressive... as easy as picking out a "goth" or a cowboy.
Stanford needs to find something more productive to do
Was a time that measuring skulls would show evidence considered indicative of a criminal personality. And it was suggested people should be locked up based on that 'indicator'.
Amazing how backward the leftists really are.