11 comments

Welcome to Dissenter

The Comment Section of the Internet
www.youtube.com
watch?v=Y4c7QSTIpCk

Tim, are you "really" surprised that The Leftist Industrial Media Complex isn't raging that a DIMOCRAT is violating the civil rights of a journalist?!? Now if it was a Republican doing it, yeah we know it would be front page NYT above the fold story; the lead story on every news broadcast; and cast as the greatest threat to a free press since Stalin.

loading...

Sorry Tim. It's just right not to cheat... And the american people can see whats going on. Tim your on the wrong side.

loading...

Tim, Napolitano is a member of the Resistance. Every single "legal" opinion I've seen him offer since Trump was elected has been proven wrong.

loading...

And nothing will happen. The media will lick Schiff's sphincter muscles like a dog to a water bowl, the courts will lap up the testimony of whatever LegalEagle-tier "lawyer" gets in the door first, and the totally-not-scripted-for-cereal political circus will go on forever and a day.

loading...

The Socicrats are actively targeting Trump supporters. Not only the rank and file voters (Antifa attacks, general 'deplorable' talk, censorship, 2A attacks, etc.) but also the elected supporters. It is when the latter happens that republicans get their panties in wad. Guess it's all grins and giggles till someone gets an eye put out.

loading...

The former AG didn't say there didn't appear to be any legitimate reason to subpoena the phone records. He said he didn't see any legitimate congressional AUTHORITY to subpoena the phone records.

loading...

as i understand it. information acquired illegal cant be used in trial. so they just need to win this and nothing they have can be used in the impeachment. easy win because of their crazy corruption.

loading...

Adam Schiff is yet another corrupt Democrat calling the kettle black. If he's digging into people's phone records, that's called wiretapping and stealing digital information. I am intimately aware of the laws about that because my own federal case was based on US v. Sutcliffe, a guy who did steal digital records (not unlike Schiff, in a way), and who did put those data into the public domain. (It's why Sutcliffe lost at trial, and I didn't, IMO. Our cases were tangential in terms of speech, but orthogonal in terms of action.) "Keep your dogs at bay!" Schiff should be exposed to prosecution if he's obtaining and publicizing someone's phone records.

loading...

It doesn't matter; Democrats do not hang. They are Teflon and if it makes you feel better to shoot the messenger go ahead.

loading...

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Y4c7QSTIpCk/

"And why behold you the speck that is in your brother's eye, but consider not the beam that is in your own eye?"- Matthew 7:3


Edit History

2019-32-Mo 03:32:43 pm

"And why behold you the speck that is in your brother's eye, but consider not the beam that is in your own eye?"- Matthew 7:3

loading...
Log In
Dissenter
connecting...