So, she no longer holds the role of "CEO" but she certainly retained the "CCO (Chief Clown Officer)" title nicely!
So, she's no longer holds the role of "CEO" but she certainly retained the "CCO (Chief Clown Officer)" title nicely!
The Donald is probably the most wholesome place on Reddit, so of course they paint it as some evil neo nazi klan page. If they ban The Donald, they're opening up pandoras box.
While Reddit pages tend to become echo boxes and to extend Donald has, its remarkably less so compared to r/politics or other politics related ones.
I've lurked on the donald for the past 3 or so years and literally not seen any racism, it may be the sub's mods doing a great job filtering what gets posted but I tend to think based on the general attitude there that it's because the people there are just, well .... normal people.
She's no longer the CEO, but she sure is having a hard time letting go of the "power" she had, and she seems more than happy to show everyone how ignorant she is to censorship's consequences.
She wan't named "Chairman Pao" for nothing.
@4:56 Should ideas pertaining to protected classes be a protected right?
ALL ideas must be protected because you don't limit your protections on THOUGHT.
Fucking Christ, Tim.
This shit right here?
This shit right here, nigga?
This shit right here is how the game works. Granting preferential treatment to some ideas creates a jurisdictional argument that other ideas are allowed to receive non-preferential treatment and discriminatory treatment.
@ 7:38 "And we're not going to make a civil rights provision saying ideas are protected."
Exactly why the fuck not Tim? The reason we don't already have one is because the concept of the government regulating thought itself was so beyond the pail to everyone more than 10 years ago that it was not only not feasible, but clearly tyrannical. All ideas should always be excluded from all regulation in all forms.
All ideas are protected because you don't limit your protections on THOUGHT.
The surprising thing is that they haven't banned it yet.
Which one is this? Chairman Pao?
No, I'm sorry Tim. I completely disagree. David Packman is very disingenuous. The left's philosophy has always been that an expression from a minority group always carry with it the oppressive scale of that group. No matter what the idea being expressed is.
Therefore, if you ban a muslim transgender lesbian bipolar helokin you're being racist, sexist, Nazi etc etc.
You know this already from Occupy Wall Street. The progressive stack does not care about what is being expressed rather, who is doing the expressing.
I just want to add that whilst the left now cry that "a private company is free to do whatever", that is completely hypocritical considering the civil rights movement was specifically for private companies are not free to do whatever.
"You should all get an account. I believe that Dissenter has the capability of becoming one of the next big things in tech." - Styxhexenhammer666