The U.S. government's top infectious disease expert said on Tuesday there were "glimmers" that social distancing efforts to slow the spread of the coronavirus were having an impact, even though the nation was still in a very dangerous situation.
11 comments

Welcome to Dissenter

The Comment Section of the Internet
www.reuters.com
article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-distancing/top-u-s-expert-sees-glimmers-social-distancing-dampening-virus-spread-idUSKBN21I27T

This is wonderful, but why stop there? Why not "social distance" to prevent spread of the flu, or the common cold, or any other transmittable disease that MIGHT kill someone somewhere? Let's "social distance" forever, after all ANYONE at ANY point in time might have an infectious disease that could kill you. Consequences? Who cares? What could possibly be more important than saving human lives?

/s

loading...

Social distancing has always been effective in preventing venereal disease.

loading...
Log In
Dissenter
connecting...