The finding came in an order directing the Justice Department to hand over secret grand jury evidence from the Mueller investigation to House impeachment investigators.
21 comments

Welcome to Dissenter

The Comment Section of the Internet
www.nytimes.com
2019/10/25/us/politics/house-impeachment-subpoenas.html

An Impeachment "inquiry" is not the same as impeachment. They can legally file an impeachment inquiry on any POTUS for any reason. The inquiry is simply an investigation as to whether an actual impeachment is needed or not. Just another Globalist smokescreen folks.

loading...

Let me guess, Obama appointed?

loading...

Show us the vote in the House of Representatives that made the House impeachment inquiry legal. As far as I know, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi launched the inquiry without House approval?

“Therefore, today, I am announcing the House of Representatives is moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry.”

loading...

The judge who ruled this is an Obama appointee.

loading...

This will be appealed.

loading...

the New York Times, enough said.

loading...

Just remember dipshits you will reap what you sow

loading...

Screw that, NYT! The impeachment "inquiry" itself is made by sore losers who just can't stand Trump. How blur did the government really are?!

loading...

Appeal. Make the rats chase their tails while Durham's boot stomps on their heads.

loading...

It isn't legal......this judge is a Democrat operative.

loading...
Log In
Dissenter
connecting...