I'm pretty sure they can just add a line to solve that problem.
Maybe something like: "Does not apply to fucking rapists."
This is how a straw man argument actually works. Concerned Person says "men should have a say." Then Some Cunt runs it through the old Rube Goldberg and figures out that "some men are rapists," concluding then that Concerned Person wants rapists to have a say.
That's not what Concerned Person said, and not something that he would even agree with, but it's what Some Cunt wants to make him defend so that he can win the argument... not based on the reasoning, but by the authority of badly informed public opinion.
We build Freedom Of Speech Software. We champion free speech, individual liberty and the free flow of information online. All are welcome.