It's not a "power grab", it's perfectly constitutional and legitimate exercise of power: POTUS named a SCOTUS nominee, and the Senate will consider whether it advises and consents to this choice.
If, by that, you mean you haven't figured out a way to humiliate her without looking like the BIGGEST ASSHOLE ON THE FACE OF THE FUCKING EARTH...
Then yeah, it would "legitimize the power grab."
Democrats keep changing the definitions of shit.
If, by that, you mean you haven't figured out a way t to humiliate her without looking like the BIGGEST ASSHOLE ON THE FACE OF THE FUCKING EARTH...
So, Elizabeth Warren is still refusing a peaceful transfer of power after the 2016 elections.
She has far, far more credibility than you will ever have, Fake-a-hontas.
You have no class whatsoever. If your side "wins" November, it will be through vote fraud alone and believe me, it WILL be challenged.
Good, she will get confirmed a few days early with all the new england dems not talking to her
This from the same people that accuse Trump of creating division.
Comrat 1/1024th is completely irrelevant.
Gonna alienate half the voters you gonna lose.
No powwow then?
No pow wow?
We build Freedom Of Speech Software. We champion free speech, individual liberty and the free flow of information online. All are welcome.