Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., took to social media on Thursday during a tornado warning in Washington, D.C., and swiftly tried to connect it to climate change -- prompting one meteorologist to call her out for not knowing "the difference between weather and climate." 
20 comments

Welcome to Dissenter

The Comment Section of the Internet
www.foxnews.com
politics/aoc-dc-tornado-warning-links-climate-change

You know how the left clowns people as "rednecks" if they cling to the Bible and guns? What do you call a marxists that clings to the most murderous ideology ever created?

loading...

I understand she sucked just as bad at being a bartender

loading...

AOC is great for Patriots. AOC will take part in the future victory of our freedom... This fucking idiot's ramblings are not going to waist. This tards vocalizations need to be shared to everyone lol...

loading...

Hmmm, a Babbling of Arts fool, knows Science. Might as well say she knows Math too....

loading...

They must confuse the two because the data does not prove or support man's effect on the climate or weather. But weather is in your face and the naive can be fooled easily.

loading...

I wonder if she can blame the 300+ Year old red spot on Jupiter as a globull warming hurricane????

loading...

If you do not believe in God you can end up believing in anything.

loading...

Remember her name is AOC she like’s Tacos and Burritos. Her last Job was working at a taco bar Burrito. Taco taco. Burrito. Taco. Taco taco. Don't think just because I got a lot of money, I'll give you taco-flavored kisses, honey. Fulfill all your wishes with my taco-flavored kisses. Taco taco. Burrito burrito. Taco taco. Don’t forget the hot sauce chulo.

loading...

Too bad that the tornado didn’t blow away a bunch of these assholes like AOC, Piglosi, Nadless, and UpChuck 🤮 Schumer!

loading...

To paraphrase the late Lord Kelvin, "if you can't measure it, it ain't science." At least with "global warming" you had numbers. You can argue about how they were collected, how they were adjusted, and what exactly they meant. But they were numbers. With "climate change" it's nothing but isolated anecdotes about local weather phenomena that change from year to year depending on just which part of the globe is experiencing "unusual" weather. Anything is "proof" of "climate change." How convenient.


Edit History

2019-46-Fr 05:46:34 pm

To paraphrase the late Lord Kelvin, "if you can't measure it, it ain't science." At lease with "global warming" you had numbers. You can argue about how they were collected, how they were adjusted, and what exactly they meant. But they were numbers. With "climate change" it's nothing but isolated anecdotes about local weather phenomena that change from year to year depending on just which part of the globe is experiencing "unusual" weather. Anything is "proof" of "climate change." How convenient.

loading...
Trending On www.foxnews.com
Trending Comments On www.foxnews.com
What people are saying...

"Andrew Torba, you are a legend, sir. This is incredibly innovative and very important." - Dave Cullen

Dissenter
connecting...