This would not be the first time Adam Schiff lied about having evidence against Trump. We're still waiting on his 'absolute proof that Trump colluded with Russia'. He's been screaming that he's holding something back. Personally, I think he's just constipated.
The malicious leaker "need not testify" and there does not need to be any crime to impeach? And...when the "whistle blow" turned out to be a false alarm, a questionably connected lawyer scares a yet another anonymous "whistle blower" with "first hand knowledge". And yet the media rages on with the same narrative and no facts.
A person with a curios mind might wonder if there every was a "whistle blower" and if the second with "first hand knowledge" will ever come forward. Based on the information we have, it is every bit as likely that there are NO whistle blowers. Instead they could be a complete fabrication by Lying Sack of Schiff and/ or his associates. Sound crazy. There is far more evidence to prove this scenario that the one that alleges the President broke the law during the phone call in question.
Can't have a circus without the clowns.
Hanged by the neck Schiff should be...three minuets after his trial...guilty he is until proven innocent...never to be.
The "whistleblower" must be exposed.