A is discussing:

Joe's hot take... is full of crap. Folau's not obligated to do anything that Joe suggests. He's allowed to express his faith in any form he deems fit. You might not like it, you might think that you can contractually suppress someone's faith - but you'd be wrong. The second we start allowing suppression of faith, you have to start applying it evenly across the board - this means the alphabet people too, because that is basically a religion now too.

I don't agree with anything that Folau says, but if we have to put up with retards in the media writing blatant falsehoods, the least we can also do is tolerate someone's opinion on divinity and the divine plan. At least Folau has a deity dictating his madness, news.com.au operate on their own smug sense of morality and insist that they both know and are better than anyone who disagrees with them by sheer virtue of posting their inane rhetoric as fact.


Edit History

2019-27-Su 12:27:41 am

Joe's hot take... is full of crap.

2019-28-Su 12:28:02 am

Joe's hot take... is full of crap. He's not obligated to do anything that Joe suggests. He's allowed to express his faith in any form he deems fit. You might not like it, you might think that you can contractually suppress someone's faith - but you'd be wrong. The second we start allowing suppression of faith, you have to start applying it evenly across the board - this means the alphabet people too, because that is basically a religion now too.

I don't agree with anything that Folau says, but if we have to put up with retards in the media writing blatant falsehoods, the least we can also do is tolerate someone's opinion on divinity and the divine plan. At least Folau has a deity dictating his madness, news.com.au operate on their own smug sense of morality and insist that they both know and are better than anyone who disagrees with them by sheer virtue of posting their inane rhetoric as fact.

loading...
Dissenter
connecting...