The attorney general has protected his boss, and impeachment looks futile. But the Democrats still have a duty to act, writes Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland
"Mueller chose instead to set the bar so high that it was bound to be out of reach: he needed to see proof of an actual “agreement” between Trump and the Kremlin to break the law to fix the 2016 election. Absent that, Trump was off the hook of criminal misconduct."
Quite right, too. That's how the rule of law works, you fuckwit. But, the Guardian, what do we expect?
"Mueller chose instead to set the bar so high that it was bound to be out of reach: he needed to see proof of an actual “agreement” between Trump and the Kremlin to break the law to fix the 2016 election. Absent that, Trump was off the hook of criminal misconduct."
Quite right, too. That's how the rule of law works, you fuckwit. But, the Guardian, what do we expect?